In the context of urban culture, visual communication, and the right of the city, her views surrounding graffiti and a delimited and static view of urban living are key. But most importantly her theses reproduce a trite and demagogic discourse about the evils of graffiti, urban deterioration, and channeling public blame over the ills of the city on marginal, and often quite dynamic groups. All at the same time leaving abandoned the environmental and civic policies that would generate a more just and sustainable urban fabric.